Avoid code duplication in StorageUtilService #1383
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@amvanbaren - At your earliest convenience, could you please take a look at this MR? |
amvanbaren
reviewed
Nov 10, 2025
Contributor
amvanbaren
left a comment
amvanbaren
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are you checking for null?
Contributor
Author
|
because I did not want to change the existing behavior of the code |
Contributor
Author
|
Closing in favor of #1452 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR avoid code duplication by introducing a
getStorageServicemethod to get the active storage service component instead of having dedicated switch statements everywhere.