Skip to content

Conversation

eevanlai-stack
Copy link
Owner

@eevanlai-stack eevanlai-stack commented Sep 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 重大变更
    • 暂停对外提供除健康检查外的所有功能与接口(如考勤、薪资、员工管理、聊天、翻译等),服务仅保留健康检查可用。
  • 已知影响
    • 应用当前不可用:无法登录、打卡、查询或提交数据。请暂缓使用,等待后续版本恢复功能与服务。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Walkthrough

本次变更在 app.py 中删除了几乎所有功能代码,包括应用初始化、CORS、内存数据存储与所有路由,仅保留错误处理器和健康检查函数定义,但缺少 Flask 应用对象与启动入口,导致模块呈非可运行骨架状态。

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
API 与应用外壳清理
app.py
移除 Flask 应用实例、CORS、内存数据存储与全部业务路由(GPS、缴费计算、打卡、考勤、薪资、预支、档案、员工 CRUD、聊天、翻译)及启动入口;仅保留 handle_bad_requesthealthz 函数定义,但无应用初始化与绑定。

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant Client as Client
  participant Flask as Flask App
  participant Handlers as Route Handlers

  rect rgb(235, 245, 255)
  note over Client,Handlers: 变更前(旧流程)
  Client->>Flask: HTTP 请求(/gps, /attendance, /payroll, ...)
  Flask->>Handlers: 路由分发
  Handlers-->>Flask: 响应数据
  Flask-->>Client: 200/4xx/5xx
  end

  rect rgb(245, 235, 235)
  note over Client,Flask: 变更后(新状态)
  Client--xFlask: 请求(大部分路由)
  note right of Client: 路由与应用实例已移除
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

我把旧巢轻轻掏,枝叶一一收好包;
路由散去风吹渺,只余心跳“healthz”秒;
待到新春再筑巢,/app 再鸣把歌谣;
兔爪敲键不言劳,代码清爽月色皎。

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed 标题 "Revert "Update app.py"" 明确表明这是对先前对 app.py 修改的回退。根据提供的 raw_summary,本次变更确实大幅还原或移除了 app.py 的功能(删除 Flask app 实例、路由和数据结构),因此标题与主要改动直接相关且具体。标题简短清晰,便于在提交历史中快速识别主要意图。
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch revert-5-eevanlai-stack-patch-2

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e52399 and beef024.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • app.py

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant