-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
Simplify error handling for dns_get_record()
#378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
aivchen
wants to merge
1
commit into
egulias:4.x
Choose a base branch
from
aivchen:dns-get-record
base: 4.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I understand
set_error_handleris possibly interfering with the broader project that might itself be setting that same error handler. Now, the function is releasing / restoring the handler at the end.The aim is to catch these errors.
Suppressing them defeats the purpose. So, what do you think if we find a way for this to be optional with the suppressed option being the default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really. In the
set_error_handlerfunction we throw an exception which we catch directly in the same file. The old code with comments.Therefore, my changes do not introduce any changes in logic - just a shorter entry.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I didn't see that we pass
trueparam in the catch block. Let me fix it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reviewed the PHP bug (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73149 ) being addressed by the workaround and it is still happening.
In short, the bug allows an unexpected error to bypass the error suppression (
@) which being un-handled then breaks the execution not only of the library but of the system using it. Which would then require our users to wrap, just in case, the call in a try/catch statement.That's something I try to avoid the users of the library to do.
So we cannot simplify the code unless the bug is fixed or a different approach is found.