Refactor/remove status column from content tables

[fulleni]

Status

READY

Description

This pull request refactors the content management tables by removing the redundant 'status' column across Headlines, Sources, and Topics pages. This change streamlines the table display, focusing on essential information, and includes minor layout adjustments to column sizes for improved visual consistency and responsiveness.

Type of Change

• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🧹 Code refactor
• ✅ Build configuration change
• 📝 Documentation
• 🗑️ Chore

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the content management tables by removing the redundant 'status' column across Headlines, Sources, and Topics pages. This change streamlines the table display, focusing on essential information, and includes minor layout adjustments to column sizes for improved visual consistency and responsiveness.

Highlights

• Removed 'status' column: The 'status' column has been entirely removed from the Headlines, Sources, and Topics content management tables, both from their column definitions and data cell rendering.
• Column size adjustments: Column sizes for 'sourceName', 'sourceType', and 'lastUpdated' have been adjusted from 'M' to 'S' for better layout. Additionally, the fixed width constraint on the 'actions' column has been removed in some tables.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request effectively refactors the content management tables by removing the now-redundant 'status' column. The changes are consistently applied across the headlines, sources, and topics pages, which is great. However, I've identified a potential issue with removing the fixedWidth from the 'actions' columns. This could lead to UI overflow errors on smaller screen sizes. I've added comments with suggestions to prevent this.