Skip to content

Conversation

tfroseman
Copy link
Collaborator

@tfroseman tfroseman commented Aug 18, 2025

This preserves existing functionality by expanding valid values for the -s flag. "strict" may not be the most appropriate, but seemed suitable. This address Issue #195

New options are

-s
-s=only
-s=strict

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 50.19%. Comparing base (b289835) to head (10f837f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
main.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.80%   50.19%   +0.38%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         259      261       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          129      131       +2     
  Misses        123      123              
  Partials        7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants