Update clap Rust crates

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
clap	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.53 -> 4.5.54
clap_builder	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.53 -> 4.5.54
clap_complete	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.64 -> 4.5.65

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap)

v4.5.54

Compare Source

Fixes

• (help) Move [default] to its own paragraph when PossibleValue::help is present in --help

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Updates dependency versions with no source changes.

• Bumps clap to 4.5.54, clap_builder to 4.5.54, and clap_complete to 4.5.65 in Cargo.lock
• Refreshes lockfile, changing transitive windows-sys refs for nu-ansi-term and term to 0.59.0

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4bd69ea. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Refreshes Cargo.lock to pick up patch updates for the clap Rust crates.

Changes: Updates clap/clap_builder to 4.5.54 and clap_complete to 4.5.65 (with associated transitive lockfile adjustments).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[augmentcode]

This lockfile refresh downgrades windows-sys from 0.61.2 to 0.59.0 (also applies at Cargo.lock:8370); can you confirm this is expected and that Windows builds remain green?

Other Locations

• Cargo.lock:8370

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (0e233cf) to head (4bd69ea).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8244   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.02%   59.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1187     1187           
  Lines      112486   112486           
  Branches     4939     4939           
=======================================
+ Hits        66394    66395    +1     
+ Misses      45334    45333    -1     
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.18% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.782 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.743 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-49.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.696 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.734 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 915 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 449 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$310 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.10 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.528 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 567 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 553 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-41.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$574 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph