chore: Use dispatch's FeeCharging strategy in HandleContext

[tinker-michaelj]

Description:

• Closes Migrate HandleContext.tryToCharge() from FeeAccumulator to FeeCharging #21775

[lfdt-bot]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.96970% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../com/hedera/node/app/spi/fees/NoopFeeCharging.java	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #21776      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.57%   71.58%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    24489    24505      +16     
============================================
  Files          2675     2675              
  Lines        103960   103986      +26     
  Branches      10880    10884       +4     
============================================
+ Hits          74408    74439      +31     
+ Misses        25487    25483       -4     
+ Partials       4065     4064       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...java/com/hedera/node/app/spi/fees/FeeCharging.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)	1.00 <1.00> (+1.00)
...hedera/node/app/spi/workflows/DispatchOptions.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)	17.00 <0.00> (ø)
.../java/com/hedera/node/app/fees/AppFeeCharging.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)	14.00 <0.00> (ø)
...de/app/workflows/handle/DispatchHandleContext.java	97.88% <100.00%> (+1.06%)	58.00 <7.00> (+11.00)
...orkflows/handle/dispatch/ChildDispatchFactory.java	86.95% <100.00%> (+0.19%)	19.00 <0.00> (+1.00)
...pp/workflows/handle/dispatch/ValidationResult.java	92.59% <100.00%> (+0.28%)	20.00 <1.00> (ø)
...e/app/workflows/handle/steps/ParentTxnFactory.java	94.11% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	18.00 <0.00> (ø)
...ows/standalone/impl/StandaloneDispatchFactory.java	95.52% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	5.00 <0.00> (ø)
.../impl/exec/scope/HandleHederaNativeOperations.java	92.98% <100.00%> (ø)	18.00 <0.00> (ø)
...mpl/exec/scope/HandleSystemContractOperations.java	97.87% <ø> (ø)	9.00 <0.00> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.01% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 96.97%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (881222a)	103865	78429	75.51%
Head commit (a9bf083)	103891 (+26)	78459 (+30)	75.52% (+0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#21776)	33	32	96.97%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[joshmarinacci]

lgtm!

[mhess-swl]

LGTM! Thanks @tinker-michaelj!

[thenswan]

Looks good from foundation perspective.

[lukasz-hashgraph]

LGTM, thanks!