fix: reduce log spam when remote node is falling behind (backport)

[abies]

Description:
Do not complain in logs when remote node is falling behind. While it is very useful info for debugging and shows that things go wrong on remote node, it is indeed a bit spammy if remote node is broken for a longer time.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #21813

Notes for reviewer:

Backport of #21824

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[lfdt-bot]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ds/platform/gossip/shadowgraph/RpcPeerHandler.java	83.33%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##             release/0.67   #21828      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           71.33%   71.35%   +0.01%     
- Complexity          24378    24379       +1     
==================================================
  Files                2664     2664              
  Lines              103756   103755       -1     
  Branches            10842    10843       +1     
==================================================
+ Hits                74019    74030      +11     
+ Misses              25695    25682      -13     
- Partials             4042     4043       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...ds/platform/gossip/shadowgraph/RpcPeerHandler.java	66.21% <83.33%> (+1.11%)	23.00 <0.00> (ø)

... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.01% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 100.00%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (70a76f6)	103661	78017	75.26%
Head commit (7bfb8df)	103660 (-1)	78029 (+12)	75.27% (+0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#21828)	6	6	100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[lpetrovic05]

There is also a RateLimitedLogger, might be more appropriate

[poulok]

Yes, that's true. We can use that class instead in main