- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 6.5k
Fix flux controlnet mode to take into account batch size #9406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
            christopher-beckham
  wants to merge
  3
  commits into
  huggingface:main
from
christopher-beckham:christopher-beckham/fix_flux_controlnet_modes
  
      
      
   
      
    
  
     Closed
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            3 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      370f382
              
                flux controlnet mode to take into account batch size
              
              
                christopher-beckham c333d89
              
                incorporate yiyixuxu's suggestions (cleaner logic) as well as clean u…
              
              
                christopher-beckham 61e0950
              
                Merge branch 'main' into christopher-beckham/fix_flux_controlnet_modes
              
              
                yiyixuxu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this right though? for multi controlnet, we loop through each controlnet, control_image and control_mode, and control_image element and control_mode does not have same batch_size
diffusers/src/diffusers/models/controlnet_flux.py
Line 446 in 5d476f5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the following setup:
If you're asking whether passing in an actual tensor for
control_imagewould work (instead of PIL), i.e:We will get an error at
_pack_latents, again this is related to the fact that the pipeline completely ignores what the batch size ofcontrol_image. We initially mentioned fixing this in a future PR but it also depends on what other pipelines have this issue. I looked at SDXL controlnet and it seems to not have this issue. It wouldn't be unreasonable to pursue fixing it in this PR but we can do a new PR if you prefer that.Also, I can clarify this works: