Skip to content

Conversation

@Hi-Fi
Copy link
Contributor

@Hi-Fi Hi-Fi commented Nov 8, 2025

@Hi-Fi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi-Fi commented Nov 8, 2025

This should be non-breaking change (as all logic should be behind the flag), but still might be good if others review this, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing JSON fields vs panic Missing field in JSON fact should not result in error while evaluating when and then of rule

1 participant