Skip to content

Build: Bump Qt6 from 6.9.1 to 6.9.2 (Automated PR) #3516

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Build: Bump Qt6 from 6.9.1 to 6.9.2 (Automated PR) #3516

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

This automated Pull Request updates the used Qt6 version to version 6.9.2.

This PR was opened by the workflow Bump dependencies (create-prs)

CHANGELOG: Build: Updated bundled Qt6 to version 6.9.2

@hoffie hoffie force-pushed the ci/bump-dependencies/Qt6 branch 2 times, most recently from a4c2063 to 35394e4 Compare August 31, 2025 20:31
@hoffie hoffie force-pushed the ci/bump-dependencies/Qt6 branch 4 times, most recently from 3865787 to 7612393 Compare September 14, 2025 14:15
@pljones
Copy link
Collaborator

pljones commented Sep 14, 2025 

Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
  "_av_buffer_create", referenced from:
      QFFmpeg::VideoEncoder::processOne() in libQt6FFmpegMediaPluginImpl.a[arm64][47](qffmpegvideoencoder.cpp.o)
      -[QAVFSampleBufferDelegate captureOutput:didOutputSampleBuffer:fromConnection:] in libQt6FFmpegMediaPluginImpl.a[arm64][52](qavfsamplebufferdelegate.mm.o)

Why's this failing again?

@hoffie hoffie force-pushed the ci/bump-dependencies/Qt6 branch from 7612393 to 4b8628a Compare September 14, 2025 16:56
@ann0see
Copy link
Member

ann0see commented Sep 14, 2025

Since we didn't add the ffmpeg argument.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@pljones @ann0see @actions-user