Skip to content

add cert configurtaion#960

Open
zhzhuang-zju wants to merge 1 commit intokarmada-io:mainfrom
zhzhuang-zju:certconfig
Open

add cert configurtaion#960
zhzhuang-zju wants to merge 1 commit intokarmada-io:mainfrom
zhzhuang-zju:certconfig

Conversation

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
add cert configurtaion

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Jan 13, 2026
@karmada-bot karmada-bot requested a review from samzong January 13, 2026 03:56
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign windsonsea for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot requested a review from Tingtal January 13, 2026 03:56
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @zhzhuang-zju, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a crucial update to the security considerations documentation by adding a dedicated section on certificate configuration. The aim is to empower users with a deeper understanding of how Karmada manages certificates for secure communication, offering insights into default settings and providing detailed instructions for customizing certificate parameters across various deployment methods. This enhancement significantly improves user control over the security posture of their Karmada environments.

Highlights

  • New Documentation Section: A comprehensive 'Certificate Configuration' section has been added to the security considerations documentation.
  • Installation Method Specifics: The new documentation details default certificate behaviors and customization options for Helm, karmadactl init, and Operator installation methods.
  • Certificate Customization: Users can now find clear guidance on adjusting certificate validity periods, RSA key lengths, and how to utilize custom Certificate Authorities (CAs) for each deployment approach.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 13, 2026
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR adds valuable documentation on certificate configuration for various Karmada installation methods. The content is clear and well-structured. I've found a few minor inconsistencies and typos that could be addressed to improve the documentation. Also, please note the typo in the pull request title ('configurtaion' should be 'configuration').

- `--ca-key-file`: 自定义的 root CA 私钥文件路径。需要和 `--ca-cert-file` 一起使用。

除此之外,也可以通过 `--config` 参数传入一个配置文件,来指定证书的相关配置选项。配置文件示例如下:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This blank line is not present in the English version of the document. For consistency between the two documents, it's recommended to remove it.

Signed-off-by: zhzhuang-zju <m17799853869@163.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants