Skip to content

Release v0.9.0#1

Merged
kusor merged 1 commit intomainfrom
benkraft.v0.9.0
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

Release v0.9.0#1
kusor merged 1 commit intomainfrom
benkraft.v0.9.0

Conversation

@kusor
Copy link
Owner

@kusor kusor commented Dec 2, 2025

The people want a release! (See discussion on Khan#394, Khan#383, fixes Khan#396.)

I'll wait to merge this until the discussion on Khan#402 is resolved, since the test flake looks like a deadlock, and I can't tell offhand if it could affect real usage.

I have:

  • Written a clear PR title and description (above)
  • Signed the Khan Academy CLA
  • Added tests covering my changes, if applicable
  • Included a link to the issue fixed, if applicable
  • Included documentation, for new features
  • Added an entry to the changelog

The people want a release! (See discussion on Khan#394, Khan#383, fixes Khan#396.)

I'll wait to merge this until the discussion on Khan#402 is resolved, since the test flake looks like a deadlock, and I can't tell offhand if it could affect real usage.
@kusor kusor merged commit bd29e10 into main Dec 2, 2025
@krish7919
Copy link

So we merged this but haven't tagged the repository yet?

@kusor
Copy link
Owner Author

kusor commented Feb 3, 2026

So we merged this but haven't tagged the repository yet?

@krish7919 actually, the stuff hasn't been merged yet into the main repo. The PR is approved (Khan#406) but not yet merged into the main branch, which means that some upgrades needed to run with recent Golang versions aren't yet part of the most recently released package.

That's actually the only reason for the existence of this repo: being able to use it with a reasonably recent set of modules that include a lot of CVE fixes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

release the changes for supporting "pointer_omitempty"

3 participants