Agent derived states #840
Merged
Agent derived states #840
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
pblazej
force-pushed
the
blaze/agent-js-updates
branch
from
f0303cc to
3aecbae
Compare
1egoman
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
1egoman
left a comment
1egoman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not a swift expert (and can't really comment on how things are exactly being done / etc) but conceptually everything makes sense to me!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
is_props to the (private for now) agent statebufferingstate was already handled inside the.connectingenum case (associated value is less error-prone)