-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Fixing missing case for handling root node for splitting #3983
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Neko-Box-Coder
wants to merge
2
commits into
micro-editor:master
Choose a base branch
from
Neko-Box-Coder:FixRootSplitBug
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The next commit seems to make this change unneeded? I mean, if we guarantee that the root is always
STUndef, why not use it? Otherwise, if we don't useSTUndef, why do we even need it?And IMHO using
STUndefmakes the code a bit more readable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor thing but I would think
n.parent == nilis more straightforward no? Since that is the definition of root node.A child node can be of type
STUndef(Although it is a bug), but a child node definite cannot have a node parent ofnilright?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then, again, why need this
STUndefconstant at all?Although, after more thought, - ok, let's keep it (even though it is causing a bit of redundancy), just to let it reflect that it is indeed undefined whether it is horizontal or vertical.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nah, we don't need it. Didn't do it cuz I only did minimal change just to fix the issue.
It doesn't matter if it is horizontal or not if it gets changed anyway. If we agree to remove it, I can do it :)