Skip to content

Conversation

bajoski34
Copy link
Contributor

@bajoski34 bajoski34 commented Sep 22, 2025

Description

Server Details

  • Server: mcp-flutterwave
  • Changes to:
{
  "identifier": "mcp-flutterwave",
  "registryType": "server",
  "version": "1.1.0",
  "transport": {
    "type": "stdio"
  },
  "repository": "https://github.com/bajoski34/mcp-flutterwave",
  "environment_variables": [
    {
      "name": "FLW_SECRET_KEY",
      "description": "Your Flutterwave secret key",
      "format": "string",
      "is_required": true,
      "is_secret": true
    }
  ]
}

Motivation and Context

Flutterwave is one of the largest fintech platforms in Africa and globally, but it currently lacks official MCP integration.
Adding this server will allow developers and businesses to:

  • Query transactions and balances
  • Manage virtual accounts
  • Automate payouts and collections
    Gain insights into payment operations inside MCP-compatible environments

This expands MCP’s reach into financial services and fintech use cases.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested locally using node with mcp-client
  • Verified connection and initialization with sample transaction queries
  • Validated server.json against the MCP registry schema

Breaking Changes

None. This is a new addition and does not affect existing servers.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
  • My changes follows MCP security best practices
  • I have updated the server's README accordingly
  • I have tested this with an LLM client
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Copy link
Member

@olaservo olaservo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! Is this an official integration, or should it go into the Community servers section instead?

@bajoski34
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @olaservo it's the official integration.

@bajoski34
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @olaservo can you help take a look at this.

@domdomegg domdomegg merged commit 28dcd95 into modelcontextprotocol:main Sep 29, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants