Removed duplicate line in function definition

[peteski22]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved parameter collection in generated MCP tool functions to remove redundant snapshotting and prevent inconsistencies between validation and parameter population, ensuring more reliable runtime behaviour.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Removed the second locals_dict = locals() reinitialisation from the generated MCP tool schema function; the function continues to use the prior captured locals_dict for parameter collection, eliminating the redundant snapshot that could drift from earlier checks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Function builder code generation src/mcpd/function_builder.py	Removed the second locals_dict = locals() reinitialisation in generated function code; generated functions now rely on the earlier captured locals_dict when building the parameters dictionary.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The PR title claims to remove a duplicate line, but the actual change introduces a bug by removing a necessary locals_dict reinitialization that causes a NameError at runtime.	Clarify the title to accurately reflect the change, such as 'Removed locals_dict reinitialization in function builder', and verify the removal doesn't break parameter collection logic.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b319c3c and a7cbd67.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/mcpd/function_builder.py (0 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[peteski22]

Walkthrough

The locals_dict reinitialization line was removed from the generated MCP tool schema function code. This previously refreshed the local-variables snapshot after building the parameters dictionary. The subsequent loop iterating over parameter names now references an undefined variable, introducing a potential runtime error.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Function builder code generation
src/mcpd/function_builder.py Removed locals_dict = locals() reinitialization from generated function code, causing the parameter collection loop to reference an undefined variable

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

✨ Finishing touches

📜 Recent review details

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Incorrect assessment:

The subsequent loop iterating over parameter names now references an undefined variable, introducing a potential runtime error.

• The first locals_dict = locals() (at line 338) is still there - it remains in scope for both loops.
• Between the validation loop and the params-building loop, no parameters change
• No new locals are created - so refresh not required

[coderabbitai]

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the function_builder.py file to verify the user's claim about locals_dict
cat src/mcpd/function_builder.py | head -360 | tail -40

Length of output: 1669

---

@peteski22, you're absolutely correct, and I apologize for the incorrect assessment in the summary.

Looking at the code, I can confirm:

• The first locals_dict = locals() at line 338 is indeed still present
• It remains in scope for both the validation loop and the params-building loop
• No new local variables are created between these two loops
• The removed line was a duplicate reinitialization that was unnecessary

Your PR correctly removes redundant code. The duplicate locals_dict = locals() served no purpose since the original assignment captures all the function parameters, and nothing changes between the two loops that would require refreshing the snapshot.

I'll regenerate the summary to reflect the accurate assessment.

✅ Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.