Update LICENSE to be public domain.#78
Open
AdityaSavara wants to merge 1 commit intonavdeep-G:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
The readme says the software is in the public domain. The LICENSE file says it is the MIT license. **Neither** of these were added by the author of the repository. However, The readme was recently updated by the author of the repository: navdeep-G@46f7cd4 From the above, I infer that the correct license should be the Unlicense license. I copied and pasted the text from the github template. Presumably, it is the same as the below link. https://unlicense.org/
Author
|
@navdeep-G It will be useful if you can personally approve the public domain license pull request. That way people can use this setup.py in federal government work without worry. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The readme says the software is in the public domain. This pull request makes the license file match that. Below are further details.
**
The readme says the software is in the public domain.
The LICENSE file says it is the MIT license.
Neither of these were added by the navdeep, though the master branch seems to now be the one created by ken-reitz who did add these. Additionally, the readme was recently updated by navdeep:
46f7cd4
From the above, I infer that the correct license should be the Unlicense license. I copied and pasted the text from the github template. Presumably, it is the same as the below link.
https://unlicense.org/