Hydration API v2

[jotare]

Description

Proposal of a v2 for the Hydration API. More flexible, more expressive and more extensible

How was this PR tested?

Describe how you tested this PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.50000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.88%. Comparing base (85212e2) to head (0e39628).
⚠️ Report is 46 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ucliadb_models/src/nucliadb_models/hydration_v2.py	97.50%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3358      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.91%   85.88%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         530      532       +2     
  Lines       43458    43645     +187     
  Branches    12104    12156      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits        37335    37485     +150     
- Misses       5534     5563      +29     
- Partials      589      597       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
nidx	79.10% <ø> (-0.43%)	⬇️
nucliadb	74.77% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
nucliadb-ingest	45.05% <0.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
nucliadb-reader	44.75% <0.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
nucliadb-search	48.96% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
nucliadb-standalone	47.89% <0.00%> (-0.19%)	⬇️
nucliadb-train	45.54% <0.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
nucliadb-writer	48.63% <0.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
nucliadb_dataset	74.11% <0.00%> (-1.70%)	⬇️
nucliadb_sdk	83.07% <0.00%> (-2.24%)	⬇️
nucliadb_telemetry	82.91% <ø> (ø)
nucliadb_utils	81.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jotare]

Apply fix for splits

[bloodbare]

    "chunks": [
        {
            "given": ["chunk_id1", "chunk_id2"],
            "select": {
                "fields": ["g/title", "f/da-summary"],
                "before": 5,
                "after": 5,
                "images": ["page"],
                "conversation": "first_and_last",
                "metadata_extension": ["origin", "classification_labels"],
                "labels": true,
                "all": false                
            }
        }
    ],
    "entities": [
        {
            "given": ["entity_id1"],
            "select": {
                "relations": ["XXXX"],
                "limit": 5
            }
        }
    ],
    "resources": [
        {
            "given": ["resource_id1", "resource_id2"],
            "select": {
                "fields": ["f/body"]
            }
        }
    ]

}```

[jotare]

Not what we wanted for a public API