Skip to content

Conversation

m-Peter
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-Peter m-Peter commented Jul 17, 2025

Work Towards: #840

Description

The totalDifficulty field was removed from the Block schema on Ethereum as well. See: ethereum/execution-apis#570


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Removed the TotalDifficulty field from block data displayed to users.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The TotalDifficulty field of type hexutil.Uint64 was removed from the Block struct in the eth/types/types.go file. No other modifications were made to the struct or related logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
eth/types/types.go Removed TotalDifficulty field from Block struct

Suggested labels

Technical Debt

Suggested reviewers

  • peterargue
  • devbugging

Poem

A block once carried weight so tall,
With TotalDifficulty, it tracked it all.
Now lighter, lean, and free to roam,
The struct’s new shape feels just like home.
Hop, hop, the code refines its way—
A rabbit’s cheer for change today! 🐇✨

Estimated code review effort

1 (<30 minutes)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6183b54 and dd27749.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • eth/types/types.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • eth/types/types.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@m-Peter m-Peter changed the title Remove 'totalDifficulty' field from Block type Remove totalDifficulty field from Block type Jul 17, 2025
@m-Peter m-Peter force-pushed the mpeter/remove-total-difficulty-block-field branch from 6183b54 to dd27749 Compare July 21, 2025 06:38
@m-Peter m-Peter merged commit d284776 into main Jul 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@m-Peter m-Peter deleted the mpeter/remove-total-difficulty-block-field branch July 21, 2025 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants