Skip to content

Conversation

kamillipka
Copy link
Contributor

@kamillipka kamillipka commented Sep 25, 2025

📝 Description

This PR changes behavior of codeql.yml workflow:

  • during checks for pull requests codeql will analyze only files that have changed
  • for other triggers all files will be analyzed

✨ Type of Change

Select the type of change your PR introduces:

  • 🐞 Bug fix – Non-breaking change which fixes an issue
  • 🚀 New feature – Non-breaking change which adds functionality
  • 🔨 Refactor – Non-breaking change which refactors the code base
  • 💥 Breaking change – Changes that break existing functionality
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🔒 Security update
  • 🧪 Tests

🧪 Testing Scenarios

Describe how the changes were tested and how reviewers can test them too:

  • ✅ Tested manually
  • 🤖 Run automated end-to-end tests

✅ Checklist

Before submitting the PR, ensure the following:

  • 🔍 PR title is clear and meaningful
  • ✍️ PR description clearly explains the changes and their reason
  • 📝 I have linked the PR to the corresponding GitHub Issues, if any
  • 💬 I have commented my code, especially in hard-to-understand areas
  • 📄 I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • ✅ I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or my feature works

Copy link
Contributor

@AlexanderBarabanov AlexanderBarabanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@kamillipka kamillipka force-pushed the klipka/148-geti-update-codeql-config-to-skip-unnecessary-checks-on-pr branch from 9362b46 to 503700a Compare September 25, 2025 10:52
@kamillipka kamillipka force-pushed the klipka/148-geti-update-codeql-config-to-skip-unnecessary-checks-on-pr branch from e9b96c2 to 1bc5787 Compare September 25, 2025 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants