Skip to content

Conversation

Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Sep 19, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Sep 19, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 19, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #13910 will not alter performance

Comparing 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype (2e20a98) with 09-18-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsuniontype (b3703d8)

Summary

✅ 37 untouched

@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-18-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsuniontype branch from 99ee15a to b3703d8 Compare September 19, 2025 09:39
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype branch from c632a94 to 2e20a98 Compare September 19, 2025 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-ast-tools Area - AST tools A-formatter Area - Formatter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant