Skip to content

Comments

stability-test - 2026-02-21 02:00:31#4227

Open
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit intopingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260221_020028-dlrfxk
Open

stability-test - 2026-02-21 02:00:31#4227
hongyunyan wants to merge 1 commit intopingcap:masterfrom
hongyunyan:stability-test-20260221_020028-dlrfxk

Conversation

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@hongyunyan hongyunyan commented Feb 20, 2026

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Minor formatting adjustment to build configuration files with no functional impact.

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign hicqu for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Feb 20, 2026
@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test next-gen

@hongyunyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 20, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A trailing blank line was added to the Makefile after the generate-next-gen-grafana recipe. This is a formatting-only change with no impact on build behavior or functionality.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Makefile Formatting
Makefile
Added trailing blank line after the generate-next-gen-grafana recipe for improved formatting consistency.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Suggested labels

lgtm, size/XS

Suggested reviewers

  • wk989898

Poem

🐰 A line so blank, so pure and white,
Makes the Makefile look just right,
No code was changed, no logic swayed,
Just spacing fixed—a perfect trade! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title 'stability-test - 2026-02-21 02:00:31' appears to be an automated timestamp label rather than a meaningful summary of the actual change (adding an empty line to Makefile). Replace the timestamp-based title with a descriptive one that reflects the actual change, such as 'Add trailing blank line to Makefile' or 'Format Makefile with trailing newline'.
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is minimal and does not follow the required template structure, missing critical sections like 'What problem does this PR solve?', 'Issue Number', test type selections, and answers to compatibility/documentation questions. Follow the repository's PR template by including all required sections: Issue Number with close/ref link, a detailed 'What is changed and how it works' section, test type checkboxes, and answers to the compatibility and documentation questions.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hongyunyan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request represents an automated stability test, intentionally introducing a minimal, non-functional change to the Makefile. The primary goal is to ensure that the automated build and test processes are functioning as expected, providing confidence in the stability of the development pipeline.

Highlights

  • Automated Stability Test: This pull request is part of an automated stability test, designed to validate the continuous integration pipeline.
  • Makefile Modification: An empty line was appended to the end of the Makefile.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • Makefile
    • Added an empty line at the end of the file.
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically generated as part of a stability test.
  • No human activity or reviews have been recorded yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a minor formatting change to the Makefile by adding a trailing newline. This is a standard practice for POSIX compliance and has no functional impact on the build system. Given the nature of this automated stability test, the change is acceptable and does not introduce any issues of medium or higher severity.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

@hongyunyan: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy-next-gen e987e05 link false /test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy-next-gen
pull-cdc-pulsar-integration-heavy-next-gen e987e05 link false /test pull-cdc-pulsar-integration-heavy-next-gen

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant