Skip to content

[CI] Add check for broken links in our documentation#1748

Draft
Lucas-C wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
ci-check-broken-links
Draft

[CI] Add check for broken links in our documentation#1748
Lucas-C wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
ci-check-broken-links

Conversation

@Lucas-C
Copy link
Member

@Lucas-C Lucas-C commented Feb 9, 2026

Currently pending this fixup: JustinBeckwith/linkinator-action#234

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the GNU LGPL 3.0 license.

@Lucas-C Lucas-C force-pushed the ci-check-broken-links branch from 4d0ab1c to 421f600 Compare February 9, 2026 09:45
@Lucas-C Lucas-C changed the title [CI] Check broken links [CI] Add check for broken links in our documentation Feb 9, 2026
@Lucas-C Lucas-C force-pushed the ci-check-broken-links branch 2 times, most recently from 41b9e8a to ed4551c Compare February 9, 2026 10:15
@Lucas-C Lucas-C marked this pull request as draft February 9, 2026 10:38
@Lucas-C Lucas-C force-pushed the ci-check-broken-links branch from ed4551c to 9b614dd Compare February 9, 2026 10:56
@andersonhc
Copy link
Collaborator

I was wondering if we could consider using something like https://github.com/actions/cache
to cache external resources, which might help make the doc job more reliable.

My sense is that the issue isn’t a broken link, but rather that the external resource is occasionally unavailable (possibly due to throttling or transient network issues).

@Lucas-C
Copy link
Member Author

Lucas-C commented Feb 10, 2026

I was wondering if we could consider using something like https://github.com/actions/cache to cache external resources, which might help make the doc job more reliable.

My sense is that the issue isn’t a broken link, but rather that the external resource is occasionally unavailable (possibly due to throttling or transient network issues).

In the end I resolved the issue with borb SVG logo in PR #1749
I'm not sure that adding caching to the docs CI job would be really useful, but I'm totally open to experiment & try new approaches 🙂

@Lucas-C Lucas-C force-pushed the ci-check-broken-links branch from 9b614dd to b651ae8 Compare February 17, 2026 09:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants