-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
feat: add free-threading classifiers #195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
914d0c9
to
a30f4bb
Compare
The Discuss thread hasn't seen updates in a while, but FWIW +1 on adding numbers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, thanks for tackling this @henryiii! My one question is whether there is a place to include the definitions of these levels, as given in https://discuss.python.org/t/free-threading-trove-classifier/62406/50
I'm not aware of one. |
Signed-off-by: Henry Schreiner <[email protected]>
9881154
to
1543182
Compare
I've rebased this, not sure what the status is. |
Pull Request is not mergeable
I added a mention of the trove classifiers to the free-threaded guide: Quansight-Labs/free-threaded-compatibility#196 |
Request to add a new Trove classifier.
The name of the classifier(s) you would like to add:
Programming Language :: Python :: Free Threading :: 1 - Unstable
Programming Language :: Python :: Free Threading :: 2 - Beta
Programming Language :: Python :: Free Threading :: 3 - Stable
Programming Language :: Python :: Free Threading :: 4 - Resilient
Why do you want to add this classifier?
See #177 and https://discuss.python.org/t/free-threading-trove-classifier/62406. I'm also asking there if
:: Single Thread
or maybe better:: Thread-safe
makes sense. I had to add numbers to get these to sort properly since the original proposal.