Skip to content

Conversation

@JacobCoffee
Copy link
Member

@JacobCoffee JacobCoffee requested a review from ewdurbin as a code owner January 13, 2026 21:26
@JacobCoffee JacobCoffee requested a review from hugovk January 13, 2026 21:28
@JacobCoffee JacobCoffee enabled auto-merge (squash) January 13, 2026 21:54
@JacobCoffee JacobCoffee disabled auto-merge January 13, 2026 21:55
@JacobCoffee
Copy link
Member Author

😵‍💫 round and round we go, back to duplicates with the main gate on push.

Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re: #2869 (comment)

Maybe keep the if:s and add one to lint.yml

Comment on lines +3 to +6
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(optional) this is identical to the original one-liner:

Suggested change
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
on: [push, pull_request, workflow_dispatch]

Comment on lines +3 to +6
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
on: [push, pull_request, workflow_dispatch]

Comment on lines +3 to +6
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
on:
push:
pull_request:
workflow_dispatch:
on: [push, pull_request, workflow_dispatch]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug(CI): CI duplication and messiness

3 participants