fix(quinn-proto): Avoid underflow panic in packet loss Instant calculations
#2436
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses the failure in #2434
Subtractions from
Instantcan underflow (and thus panic), because theu64stored internally might be relative to some startup time that might be too recent.This is what caused the failure in Wasm: The instant was relative to the process startup time, in one case ~15s, but the
loss_delaywas set to ~17s in that case.Instead, this PR aims to compare the saturated difference of
nowandinfo.time_sent, and see if that's bigger thanloss_delayor not.Unfortunately I don't know of a different way of resolving this. There's no such thing as
Instant::saturating_sub, and there's noInstant::MINor similar with which it could be implemented.Even though this addresses a problem in Wasm, this case can also happen in MacOS and other platforms, but requires different, less common edge-cases to trigger.