Skip to content

Conversation

@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor

@kilograham kilograham commented Feb 15, 2025

fixes #1898

…e with a size of zero is not a legal SVD, so including something hopefully harmless
…competing #defines as these were called USER_IRQs in the SDK 1.x
@kilograham kilograham added this to the 2.1.1 milestone Feb 15, 2025
@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor Author

kilograham commented Feb 15, 2025

Note, i have not added the extra IRQs to the RP2040 SVD as i don't know if that is rocking the boat too much (as i'd have to change the numInterrupts)

@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @jonathanpallant, @pta2002, @jannic

not sure if i want to risk making this change at the last hour for 2.1.1 - LMK... if i don't see lots of happy faces, I'll push it to 2.1.2

@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor Author

pushing to 2.2.0 since still no feedback

@jonathanpallant
Copy link

Looks ok to me

@kilograham kilograham modified the milestones: 2.2.0, 2.1.2 Mar 20, 2025
@kilograham kilograham requested a review from lurch March 22, 2025 23:22
lurch
lurch previously approved these changes Mar 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lurch lurch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've not tested this, but it all looks sensible.

@kilograham kilograham merged commit 39fafaa into develop Mar 25, 2025
8 checks passed
@kilograham kilograham deleted the spare_irq_and_svd branch March 25, 2025 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants