-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
$file.readBuffer to read the data from disk #343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
silverweed
merged 9 commits into
root-project:dev
from
Krmjn09:feature/deserializePage()-code
Jun 30, 2025
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ffec80a
$file.readBuffer to read the data from disk
Krmjn09 f6dfc7b
Added rntuple_test.jsin .yml
Krmjn09 14cdddb
Added the simple.root
Krmjn09 ff2e659
uncommented the code
Krmjn09 13f45a5
removed warnings
Krmjn09 a46c75b
Column Validation
Krmjn09 c0068ba
simple method to pass simple.root
Krmjn09 f688edd
Calculating the uncompressed Size
Krmjn09 9a75e5f
suggeted changes
Krmjn09 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you comment out all the new code and changed back the rntuple file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like i don't know how can I add the root file in GitHub once I get to know that I will uncomment the code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you can just
git add
the root file in thedemo
directory (is that ok @linev)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added that one file forcefully correctly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
still failing the checks ! Cant understand the problem
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok!! Thankyou for clarification
And yes both my root and test file are present in demo/node directory
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that even though the test file is in a directory it's not necessarily true that the tests are run from that directory; you should be able to find out the working directory by printing out
__dirname
from the test.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In some tests one do:
See examples in the
jsroot-ci.yml
fileThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Used absolute path with __dirname , the issue is resoved now !!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I wrote before - much easier to run tests from current directory.
Then simple file path can be used.