Remove incorrect sentence #849
Conversation
|
@maelle I have approved; can you please merge? Merci! |
|
I'll try to come back to this PR soon. I need to update the Spanish file and Portuguese PR if it exists. |
|
I don't think the sentence is actually incorrect: if a package is unarchived from ropensci-archive it should go to ropenscilabs (sometimes it goes to ropensci but it's a mistake 😅 ). |
|
Oh, sorry, I thought it would go back to the ropensci repository if fit. Does it go to ropenscilab first to ensure it is up to rOpenSci standards? |
|
Yes in theory at least that was the idea. @mpadge any comment? |
|
I think removing that sentence is good. As far as I'm aware, there haven't even been any unarchived packages for ... years. And going by the unused = unnecessary principle, this removes cruft from the dev guide, so 👍 |
|
Thanks again and sorry for the delay! |
* add translation * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * align with #849 * Update maintenance_evolution.pt.Rmd Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]>
3 participants
The last sentence of maintenance_evolution repeated something on the check-list with a different organization name. I think it can be removed to avoid confusion.