Skip to content

Conversation

rgerhards
Copy link
Member

Summary

  • ensure ln_errprintf forwards the configured error callback cookie
  • add a unit test that confirms the error callback receives the registered cookie and hook it into the test suite

Testing

  • autoreconf -fi (fails: aclocal is not available in the container)

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68cbac0f01488332a647a95b40c38351

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @rgerhards, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a subtle but important bug in the error handling mechanism where the incorrect cookie was being passed to the error callback function. The primary change ensures that the ln_errprintf function uses the errmsgCookie instead of dbgCookie. To prevent future regressions and validate the fix, a dedicated unit test has been introduced, which verifies the proper forwarding of the error callback cookie.

Highlights

  • Error Callback Cookie Fix: The ln_errprintf function now correctly forwards the configured error callback cookie to the error message callback function, resolving an issue where the wrong cookie was being passed.
  • New Unit Test: A new unit test, err_callback_cookie, has been added to confirm that the error callback receives the registered cookie as expected. This test is integrated into the existing test suite.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug where the error callback was being passed the debug cookie instead of the error cookie. The addition of a unit test to verify this fix is also a great inclusion. I've provided a few suggestions to improve code style and enhance the new test's clarity and robustness, mainly by fixing an indentation issue and adding better error reporting to the test case for easier debugging.

}

ctx->errmsgCB(ctx->dbgCookie, msg, lenBuf);
ctx->errmsgCB(ctx->errmsgCookie, msg, lenBuf);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This line has inconsistent indentation (7 spaces). It should be aligned with the following line. Using a tab would be consistent with the project's style, but aligning it with 8 spaces would also improve readability.

        ctx->errmsgCB(ctx->errmsgCookie, msg, lenBuf);

#include "config.h"
#include "liblognorm.h"
#include "lognorm.h"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's good practice for tests to report why they failed. To add error logging using fprintf for better diagnostics (as suggested in other comments), please include the <stdio.h> header here.

#include <stdio.h>

Comment on lines +17 to +19
if(cookie == state) {
state->cookie_match = 1;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The check if(cookie == state) is redundant because state is assigned the value of cookie on line 13. This condition will always be true if state is not NULL. You can simplify the code by removing this if statement.

                state->cookie_match = 1;

Comment on lines +33 to +34
if(ctx == NULL)
return ret;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

If ln_initCtx() fails, the test exits with a failure code but provides no information about what went wrong. Adding an error message to stderr would make it easier to debug test failures.

        if(ctx == NULL) {
                fprintf(stderr, "ln_initCtx() failed\n");
                return ret;
        }

Comment on lines +36 to +37
if(ln_setErrMsgCB(ctx, error_callback, &state) != 0)
goto done;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to the context initialization, if ln_setErrMsgCB() fails, the test will fail without indicating the cause. Adding an error message here would improve debuggability.

        if(ln_setErrMsgCB(ctx, error_callback, &state) != 0) {
                fprintf(stderr, "ln_setErrMsgCB() failed\n");
                goto done;
        }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant