Skip to content

Fix indent for trait_impl_redundant_assoc_item #20681

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix indent for trait_impl_redundant_assoc_item #20681

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+114 −7

Conversation

A4-Tacks
Copy link
Contributor

Example

trait Foo {
}
impl Foo for () {
    $0fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}

Before this PR:

trait Foo {
    fn foo<T>(&self)
where
    T: Copy,;
}
impl Foo for () {
    fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}

After this PR:

trait Foo {
    fn foo<T>(&self)
    where
        T: Copy,;
}
impl Foo for () {
    fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 17, 2025
@A4-Tacks
Fix indent for trait_impl_redundant_assoc_item
471c41a 
Example
---
```rust
trait Foo {
}
impl Foo for () {
    $0fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}
```

**Before this PR**:

```rust
trait Foo {
    fn foo<T>(&self)
where
    T: Copy,;
}
impl Foo for () {
    fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}
```

**After this PR**:

```rust
trait Foo {
    fn foo<T>(&self)
    where
        T: Copy,;
}
impl Foo for () {
    fn foo<T: Copy>(&self);
}
```
@A4-Tacks A4-Tacks force-pushed the indent-diag-reduanted-trait-assoc branch from c1ec09f to 471c41a Compare September 17, 2025 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@A4-Tacks @rustbot