Skip to content

fix(clone_on_ref_ptr): only name the generic type if possible #15740

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix(clone_on_ref_ptr): only name the generic type if possible #15740

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ada4a
Copy link
Contributor

@ada4a ada4a commented Sep 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #15009

changelog: [clone_on_ref_ptr]: only name the generic type if possible

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 23, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 23, 2025

r? @y21

rustbot has assigned @y21.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Sep 23, 2025
@ada4a ada4a mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2025
Open
@ada4a
Copy link
Contributor Author

ada4a commented Sep 23, 2025

@rustbot label -S-blocked

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@y21 y21

Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clone-on-ref-ptr type suggestion in case of closure is not applicable
3 participants
@ada4a @rustbot @y21