Skip to content

Conversation

@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

@traviscross traviscross commented Jul 24, 2025

In the context of a project goal reserving the bandwidth of a team, the work of reviewing and revising proposed Reference text at this time falls more on the T-lang-docs side rather than on the T-spec side. So let's update the relevant project goals and the template accordingly.

cc @rust-lang/lang-docs

Rendered

@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @tomassedovic

@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor

ojeda commented Jul 24, 2025

Sounds good, thanks!

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

@traviscross the CI failure comes from the fact that the team asks have specific wording defined here:

"Finalize specification text" = { short="Spec text", about="assign a spec team liaison to finalize edits to Rust reference/specification" }

If this is more accurate I'm happy to update that file, but I think we should have someone from @rust-lang/lang-docs chime in as well.

@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/reference-lang-docs branch 2 times, most recently from acf4313 to 33c9ca2 Compare July 24, 2025 20:53
In the context of a project goal reserving the bandwidth of a team,
the work of reviewing and revising proposed Reference text at this
time falls more on the T-lang-docs side rather than on the T-spec
side.  So let's update the relevant project goals and the template
accordingly.
@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/reference-lang-docs branch from 33c9ca2 to 6ff9b05 Compare July 24, 2025 21:09
@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks. Fixed.

If this is more accurate I'm happy to update that file, but I think we should have someone from @rust-lang/lang-docs chime in as well.

I'm on lang-docs and one of the currently N=2 people who merge Reference PRs. This change is OK and improves clarity given how things work today.

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

Ah right, it's just you and Eric isn't it? Looks good, thanks!

@tomassedovic tomassedovic merged commit f5c22e2 into main Jul 25, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants