Skip to content

Conversation

@jdonszelmann
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ghost

Just a little experiment to see how much it gains us. All incremental tests pass, I've not found a place yet where it matters that we track them. It makes some sense, spans are relative to their parent anyway so it makes some sense that they're regenerated anyway if their parent changes. But I can't yet prove this. I am wondering how much perf it gains us.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 12, 2025
@jdonszelmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
[EXPERIMENT DO NOT MERGE] remove span tracking during lowering
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 12, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Dec 12, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f592d8b (f592d8b65d4bd187ed675b06225568ccbe3a1a30, parent: 2a3a62d26e9e5badb806ac6a43bb307ff472b514)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued f592d8b with parent 2a3a62d, future comparison URL.
There are currently 3 preceding artifacts in the queue.
It will probably take at least ~3.6 hours until the benchmark run finishes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants