Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughEpisode metadata rendering was moved from the page into the Layout via a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/pages/`[episode].astro:
- Around line 158-170: Compute a single image source (e.g., const imageSrc =
episode.episodeImage ?? show.image ?? null) and use that to decide rendering:
only render the <img> when imageSrc is truthy (or fallback to a placeholder
URL), replacing direct use of episode.episodeImage and show.image in the JSX;
update the <img> props to use imageSrc and ensure loading/alt/width/height
remain intact. This prevents rendering an <img> with an empty src and avoids
broken image requests.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/[episode].astro (1)
158-159: Consider a mobile-first column layout.Side-by-side layout on small screens can make the description harder to read. A
flex-coldefault withlg:flex-rowkeeps desktop layout while improving mobile readability.♻️ Suggested tweak
- <div class="flex gap-6"> + <div class="flex flex-col gap-6 lg:flex-row lg:items-start">
src/pages/[episode].astro
Outdated
| <div class="flex gap-6"> | ||
| <p class="mb-8 flex-1 lg:mb-12"> | ||
| {episode.description} | ||
| </p> | ||
|
|
||
| <img | ||
| alt={`${episode.title} - episode art`} | ||
| class="h-24 w-24 shrink-0 rounded-lg shadow-lg lg:h-32 lg:w-32" | ||
| height={128} | ||
| loading="eager" | ||
| src={episode.episodeImage ?? show.image} | ||
| width={128} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guard against missing image URL.
If both episode.episodeImage and show.image are falsy, the <img> renders without a src, which can trigger a request to the current page and show a broken image. Consider computing a single imageSrc and conditionally rendering the <img> only when it exists (or provide a placeholder).
🔧 Suggested fix
---
// frontmatter
+const episodeImageSrc = episode.episodeImage ?? show.image;- <div class="flex gap-6">
+ <div class="flex gap-6">
<p class="mb-8 flex-1 lg:mb-12">
{episode.description}
</p>
-
- <img
- alt={`${episode.title} - episode art`}
- class="h-24 w-24 shrink-0 rounded-lg shadow-lg lg:h-32 lg:w-32"
- height={128}
- loading="eager"
- src={episode.episodeImage ?? show.image}
- width={128}
- />
+ {episodeImageSrc ? (
+ <img
+ alt={`${episode.title} - episode art`}
+ class="h-24 w-24 shrink-0 rounded-lg shadow-lg lg:h-32 lg:w-32"
+ height={128}
+ loading="eager"
+ src={episodeImageSrc}
+ width={128}
+ />
+ ) : null}
</div>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/pages/`[episode].astro around lines 158 - 170, Compute a single image
source (e.g., const imageSrc = episode.episodeImage ?? show.image ?? null) and
use that to decide rendering: only render the <img> when imageSrc is truthy (or
fallback to a placeholder URL), replacing direct use of episode.episodeImage and
show.image in the JSX; update the <img> props to use imageSrc and ensure
loading/alt/width/height remain intact. This prevents rendering an <img> with an
empty src and avoids broken image requests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/episode/CreatorsAndGuests.astro (1)
5-15: AlignhostsAndGuests.idtype with DB‑sourced data.
Layout now introducesHostOrGuestData.idas a number; keepingid: stringhere can tripastro checkor TS tooling. Consider widening to accept numbers.♻️ Suggested tweak
export interface Props { hostsAndGuests: Array<{ - id: string; + id: string | number; img: string | null; isHost: boolean; name: string; }>; singleColumn?: boolean; }
|
I think we should chat with our designer and look at rethinking things a bit in general, so let's hold off on this. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.