Skip to content

feat(app-wall): add tddworks#1

Closed
hanrw wants to merge 1 commit intotddworks:mainfrom
hanrw:app-wall/tddworks
Closed

feat(app-wall): add tddworks#1
hanrw wants to merge 1 commit intotddworks:mainfrom
hanrw:app-wall/tddworks

Conversation

@hanrw
Copy link
Member

@hanrw hanrw commented Mar 4, 2026

Add tddworks to the app wall

Submitted via asc app-wall submit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new developer entry to the registry.
  • Chores

    • Refined formatting consistency in configuration data.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new developer entry ("tddworks") was added to the JSON array in homepage/apps.json, along with minor whitespace formatting adjustments to align JSON structure. The file's overall structure and existing data values remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Developer Registration
homepage/apps.json
Added new developer object with "tddworks" credentials and adjusted JSON formatting for consistency.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐰 A fresh developer joins the fray,
"tddworks" hops into display,
JSON clean with spacing bright,
One more builder, what a sight!
The array grows, the code's delight! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat(app-wall): add tddworks' directly and clearly describes the main change: adding the tddworks developer to the app wall, which aligns perfectly with the changeset modifications.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@homepage/apps.json`:
- Around line 8-10: The apps.json entry for "tddworks" only contains "developer"
and "github" so it gets skipped by the processing logic that checks
entry.developerId or non-empty entry.apps; update the "tddworks" object to
include either a developerId field that matches your lookup (e.g.,
"developerId": "tddworks") or add a non-empty "apps" array with the app objects
you want rendered so homepage/fetch-apps-data.js will include the entry and
homepage/index.html will render it.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3cbee66c-ddb8-4f4c-bc04-16865ec8a665

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 731ec7f and 64411cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • homepage/apps.json

Comment on lines +8 to +10
{
"developer" : "tddworks",
"github" : "tddworks"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add an app source (developerId or apps) for tddworks or this entry will never render.

homepage/fetch-apps-data.js (Line 39-105) only processes entries with entry.developerId or non-empty entry.apps. With only developer + github, this row is skipped, so homepage/index.html gets no item to render.

Suggested fix
   {
     "developer" : "tddworks",
+    "developerId" : "<APP_STORE_DEVELOPER_ID>",
     "github" : "tddworks"
   }

Or, if you want explicit apps instead of a developer lookup:

   {
     "developer" : "tddworks",
     "github" : "tddworks",
+    "apps" : [
+      "https://apps.apple.com/app/id1234567890"
+    ]
   }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
{
"developer" : "tddworks",
"github" : "tddworks"
{
"developer" : "tddworks",
"developerId" : "<APP_STORE_DEVELOPER_ID>",
"github" : "tddworks"
}
Suggested change
{
"developer" : "tddworks",
"github" : "tddworks"
{
"developer" : "tddworks",
"github" : "tddworks",
"apps" : [
"https://apps.apple.com/app/id1234567890"
]
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@homepage/apps.json` around lines 8 - 10, The apps.json entry for "tddworks"
only contains "developer" and "github" so it gets skipped by the processing
logic that checks entry.developerId or non-empty entry.apps; update the
"tddworks" object to include either a developerId field that matches your lookup
(e.g., "developerId": "tddworks") or add a non-empty "apps" array with the app
objects you want rendered so homepage/fetch-apps-data.js will include the entry
and homepage/index.html will render it.

@hanrw hanrw closed this Mar 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant