Open
Conversation
geealbers
requested changes
Mar 2, 2026
Member
geealbers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Loving the FAQ! Just made a few small suggestions
|
|
||
| ## Is my project right for Quire? | ||
|
|
||
| Quire is optimized for book-like projects, especially those that rely on visual illustrations and/or scholarly apparatus like citations, bibliographies, and footnotes. Quire is also ideal for projects you want to last a long-time. While most websites have a lifespan of website is 2-5 years, the very first Quire publication, *Ancient Terracottas*, was released in 2016 and is still going strong. |
|
|
||
| **Project types not ideal for Quire**: | ||
|
|
||
| - Non-textual, image-intensive presentations, like an online exhibition or a fully illustrated children’s book or graphic novel. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd leave "online exhibition" out of the mix here as exhibition catalogues would definitely be in Quire's wheelhouse. And I don't think the difference between online exhibition and exhibition catalogue is readily apparent to most people
Non-textual, image-intensive presentations, like a fully illustrated children’s book or graphic novel.
|
|
||
| ## What is the difference between v0 and v1? | ||
|
|
||
| When Quire was first launched in 2016 we used the static-site generator Hugo. However, when we decided to open-source the tool in 2022 we switched to Eleventy as our static-site generator since it was based on JavaScript and that is a more common code language in the cultural heritage sector. Publications built with v0 will continue to work and are not deprecated, however, they may be more difficult to update over time. For new users, we recommend using v1 as it is the most stable, reliable, and fully featured version of the tool. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Technically, Quire used a static-site generator called Middleman in 2016. Hugo didn't come until, I think, 2017 or 2018. Maybe something like:
The first release of Quire (v0) used the static-site generator Hugo. However, when we decided ...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.