Skip to content

Conversation

@roryokane
Copy link

By the time I found out that this implementation does not provide each, I had already put this library in my Gemfile and started rewriting some methods to use this library. This disclaimer should prevent others from spending their time integrating with a trie implementation that does not fit their needs.

This disclaimer is based on Tyler’s comment in issue #19.

By the time I found out that this implementation does not provide `each`, I had already put this library in my `Gemfile` and started rewriting some methods to use this library. This disclaimer should prevent others from spending their time integrating with a trie implementation that does not fit their needs.

This disclaimer is based on Tyler’s comment in issue tyler#19.
@tyler
Copy link
Owner

tyler commented Apr 6, 2015

Holding off on this until I decide whether or not to implement libdatrie's iteration functionality. Leaning toward yes right now...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants