Skip to content

Conversation

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sylvestre sylvestre force-pushed the mv-special branch 2 times, most recently from 40dea6c to 6589c15 Compare August 24, 2025 21:45
@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/mv-special-1 is no longer failing!

@sylvestre sylvestre requested a review from cakebaker August 25, 2025 07:21
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the new test supposed to pass without the changes made to mv.rs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nope but it is fixed now

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 23, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8521 will not alter performance

Comparing sylvestre:mv-special (8867591) with main (909da50)

Summary

✅ 106 untouched
⏩ 73 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 73 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/mv-special-1 is no longer failing!

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/mv-special-1 is no longer failing!

@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit 8fbd089 into uutils:main Oct 24, 2025
123 of 125 checks passed
@cakebaker
Copy link
Contributor

Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/mv-special-1 is no longer failing!

Great :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants