Skip to content

Fix scenario numbering mismatch in checkBlockingConditions#831

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intoakhilailla/test_testfrom
copilot/sub-pr-823
Draft

Fix scenario numbering mismatch in checkBlockingConditions#831
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intoakhilailla/test_testfrom
copilot/sub-pr-823

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 24, 2026

The inline scenario labels (Scenario 2, Scenario 3) inside checkBlockingConditions were off by one relative to the JSDoc block comment, which enumerated exactly two blocking scenarios (1–2).

Change

Renumbered the inline labels to match the JSDoc:

// Before
// Scenario 2: Command failures always block
// Scenario 3: Validation errors block unless acknowledged

// After
// Scenario 1: Command failures always block
// Scenario 2: Validation errors block unless acknowledged

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: AkhilaIlla <36493984+AkhilaIlla@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update staging-lint-check workflow documentation Fix scenario numbering mismatch in checkBlockingConditions Feb 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants