Normalize/Rescale for Number of Variables/Pathways

[osundwajeff]

Fixes #722

[osundwajeff]

Hi @robertohuru
I think my changes touch on some parts of what you updated last week, hence the conflict under the function run_pathways_weighting.
I wanted to get more clarification from you on what your changes focused on as that would mean I might have to refactor or strip away my implementation.

[robertohuru]

@osundwajeff my implementation focused on weighting the pathways using the impact values from the matrix of relative impact between the pathways and the PWLs. The output pathways at this level should not be scaled or normalized. There is an overlap between this ticket and #697 #740.

To ensure that we don't break existing functions, it would be nice to just have a dedicated function for this ticket since it deals with normalizing outputs rather than weighting pathways.

[github-actions]

🚀 Plugin Build Successful! ✅

A new plugin build has been successfully generated for the changes in this pull request! 🎉

🔗 Download Plugin Zip 📥

📌 Next Steps

• 📥 Download and test the plugin built from this pull request.
• 🔄 Review the changes and validate functionality.
• 📝 Provide feedback on this pull request!

---

🛠 Powered by GitHub Actions & gh API