-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
GH-48174: [CI][Dev] Fix shellcheck errors in ci/scripts/util_download_apache.sh #48175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-48174: [CI][Dev] Fix shellcheck errors in ci/scripts/util_download_apache.sh #48175
Conversation
|
|
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-* |
raulcd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR, if you can rebase with main the linter failure should be fixed there now.
I am running the crossbow jobs for the test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-* jobs which are the only ones that seem to use this script (to download hdfs)
|
Revision: 3091d25 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4a52ca93c7
|
|
Thanks for the PR @hiroyuki-sato !!! Lines 913 to 922 in 303d077
An example of a task with timeout here: Line 939 in 303d077
|
3091d25 to
db609ab
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-* |
|
Revision: db609ab Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-7c1ea37107
|
|
@raulcd Thanks! rebased . It seems that `C++ / AMD64 macOS 15-intel C++ (pull_request) and C++ / ARM64 macOS 14 C++ (pull_request) failures don't relates to this PR. |
raulcd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your PR! @hiroyuki-sato
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 9dfc3af. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Rationale for this change
This is the sub issue #44748.
What changes are included in this PR?
"${APACHE_MIRRORS[@]}"instead of${APACHE_MIRRORS[*]}.if cmd ; thenstatement instead of$?.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.