-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
fix(imgix): types for combined 'auto' operations #178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should allow boolean
truehere too. I won't block on that, because it should also have runtime handling, but it would be a good thing to have as a follow-up.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's how I did it initially, but in the end I felt it could be confusing.
Without digging into how it works I expected that (1) would be implied in (2) as a truthy value, but it needs to be explicit like in (3). What's more, if omitted (0) it kinda breaks the convention with booleans being falsy by default, when in reality the default is (4)
auto="format".Despite all this, I don't have a particularly strong opinion about it. It should be fine, as long as it's documented with
@defaultand a short explanation. I'd like to open a follow-up Imgix PR with some improvements and more operations, so I'll include it there.Edit: Thanks for responding so quickly by the way!