-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Update HGCal testbeam relval workflow #48941
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48941/46097 |
test parameters: |
A new Pull Request was created by @hqucms for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
assign hgcal-dpg |
New categories assigned: hgcal-dpg @cseez,@felicepantaleo,@pfs,@rovere you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
localdir = 'local_daq/ramdisk/run20000000' | ||
os.makedirs(localdir, exist_ok=True) | ||
for f in files: | ||
os.system(f'xrdcp --silent -f root://cms-xrd-global.cern.ch//{inputdir}/{f} {localdir}') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just a question: is it unavoidable to copy the files over?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK the DAQSource
does not speak the xrootd protocol.
I think you can avoid making a copy of the files if the machine(s) where the jobs are run mount /eos/cms/store/group/dpg_hgcal/comm_hgcal/relval/
.
test parameters:
|
I tested locally and there's no problem with gpu enable. The error here seems to be is that the workflow is not defined in the list of RelVals AMD_MI300X, etc. Can someone guide me where should this be defined (or the twiki that explains it)? |
Mhm, I though the entry |
Let's try this... |
ok thanks, let me keep investigating. I'll trigger the tests again as I want to get the commands with a more recent IB that includes #48944 |
please test |
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_T4 Comparison SummarySummary:
|
ok looks like it ran fine! |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR updates the HGCal testbeam relval (workflow 77.0) to start from the DTH-P2 raw data.
This PR requires:
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -w standard --ibeos -l 77
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
No backport foreseen.