Skip to content

Conversation

AbishekS
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs

TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run

Differential Revision: D83086473

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 24, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
Summary:

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
Summary:

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

Copy link
Contributor

@kiukchung kiukchung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the two component integ tests that are failing might be a transient failure. Retry them.

@AbishekS
Copy link
Contributor Author

the two component integ tests that are failing might be a transient failure. Retry them.

@kiukchung To retry the tests that are on github, I cant seem to find the retry action for it. Is it something that requires other perms somewhere? Or should i simply rebase and retry?

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
Summary:
X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.63%. Comparing base (b72ba03) to head (bd26e93).
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1125   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.63%   91.63%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        6392     6394    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         5857     5859    +2     
  Misses        535      535           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.63% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

AbishekS added a commit to AbishekS/torchx that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

Summary:

X-link: meta-pytorch#1125

So that the one below is valid and does not use any configs
```
TORCHXCONFIG="" torchx run
```

Reviewed By: kiukchung

Differential Revision: D83086473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AbishekS has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D83086473.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit dc79474 into meta-pytorch:main Sep 29, 2025
19 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants